Backup data from Google Drive, Dropbox, and others.Data recovery, file versioning, and remote upload.30 days of trash history and extended file history.
![owncloud providers owncloud providers](https://central.owncloud.org/uploads/db1708/original/2X/3/36379c3e97d06e651cd1987284265c2f53490a4f.png)
#Owncloud providers install#
Install us into your existing IT infrastructure, leave your files where they are, take advantage of the investments you’ve already made. We too offer free, but it is in the open source model. Of course, our model is looking really good right now. Be wary if your business model is storage (I am talking to you, Box). For Google, this is great – it is a loss leader for their advertising revenue stream.
#Owncloud providers for free#
More people will jump on Google drive because they get more storage for free (up to 50GB). Why is this cost being driven to zero? Because at least one big player in this market is using storage as a loss leader for other business. This is what Canonical found out, and I bet we see more and more of this shake out in the near future. Give more for free, fixed costs remain…the business model will not work. This makes sense if some people pay, but when more and more is offered for free…the math of recouping that “free” on the backs of those that pay begins to not balance. But there seems to be this concept in the market today that you can give cloud storage away for free, and make up for it in volume.
![owncloud providers owncloud providers](https://uploads.sitepoint.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/1479907425sharing_admin.png)
And, as we’ve seen with Canonical, how many of these storage providers can long afford this race to the bottom?ĭon’t misinterpret this, there is nothing wrong with Free. Here was a case of Canonical, a terrific company by any measure, getting caught in that sucking vortex of “free storage.” When millions are taking advantage of “free” cloud storage, the few (industry average is below 5%) who are paying – are REALLY paying the freight. If we offer a service, we want it to compete on a global scale, and for Ubuntu One to continue to do that would require more investment than we are willing to make. the free storage wars aren’t a sustainable place for us to be, particularly with other services now regularly offering 25GB-50GB free storage. At the risk of being redundant, I have to comment on the Canonical Ubuntu One story.